The European Court of Human Rights

It’s bad enough having liars, thieves, cheats and their fat-fingered lawyers use and abuse human rights laws by forcing outrageous/spurious compensation claims through the various layers of our own appeal system. Allowing Brussels to add another expensive and time-consuming layer is yet another example of how a minority of politically correct fuck-wets has been able to so easily impose their limp-wristed views upon the Apathetic Majority.

The concept of having clearly defined human rights laws accepted by all European nations makes a lot of sense. Sure, not all of them are going to hit exactly the right note with everybody but the very clever people we employ to deal with such things should be able to ensure human rights laws can be sensibly interpreted by individual nations to reflect the majority views/opinions of their people.

But they don’t

Truth is, unelected people in Europe are creating lots of jobs and money for themselves and their fat-fingered legal advisers by insisting that the letter rather then the spirit/intent of these laws bust be blindly observed.

It’s costing our business community £billions every year in litigation costs, lost production time and the salaries/fees paid to the army of human resource specialists who now have to be employed to deal with the many and varied complexities of these laws. Worse, human rights issues have caused an incalculable reduction in the level of goodwill and loyalty that once existed between employers and employees. As a consequence, all decent hardworking folk experience increasing difficulty in securing and keeping a job – especially women.